|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Issue: As a consequence of price erosion on the client’s products as
they became more commoditized, it became essential for them to preserve
margin through cost efficiencies.
- Due to temperature constraints, they deliver a particular product line
via air freight.
- Because of the numerous distributor sites in place, they relied heavily
on LTL delivery, rather than truckload.
- Objective: Reduce freight costs without negatively affecting service.
|
|
3
|
- Freight cost per unit of sale (lbs.or gm.)
- On-time delivery performance
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
- Total Freight Expense: $1.93 mil.
(net after prepay and add)
- Approx. Int’l Freight: $150k
- Net N.A. Freight: $1.78 mil.
- Prepaid Distributor Freight: $915k – 51%
- Prepaid Direct Freight: $865k – 49%
- Freight Terms:
- 33% Prepaid
- 67% Customer Paid (Prepay & Add/Collect)
|
|
14
|
- Overall Mode Mix
- 28% Air/72% Ground ($490k/$1,281k)
- Prepaid Distributor Mode Mix
- 19.5% Air/79.5% Ground ($178k/$737k)
- Overall Freight/Sales Ratio: 1.5%
- Total Freight Paid/Total Revenue
- Below 2% is considered quite good.
- Prepaid Freight/Sales Ratio – 4.6%
- Total Freight Paid/Revenue Associated with Prepaid Freight Transactions
- Cost Comparison – Freight Modes ($/lb.) Average:
- Air $1.00/lb.
- LTL Truck $0.10/lb.
- TL Truck $0.08/lb.
|
|
15
|
- Under the present model, for every $100 in additional distributor sales,
where client pays the freight, their freight costs increase by $4.60.
- Converting to prepaid distribution $8 mil. of additional tier three
direct business, currently moving on a collect basis, would cost client
$368k (based on current freight ratios).
- If a significant amount of our current direct business is converted to
distribution, they could, under the present model, incur a substantial
increase in freight costs.
|
|
16
|
- Consolidate deliveries to partners on a weekly basis with shipment via
truck, rather than air.
- Reduce the number of ship-to locations to maximize the opportunity for
consolidation.
- Present distributor network displays many apparent redundancies.
- The fewer ship-to locations, the more opportunities for consolidation
of shipment and reduced freight costs.
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
- Migrate from 15 to 5 distributors
- Reduce number of distributor locations from 39 to 9
- Increase reliance on truckload vs. LTL
- Increase reliance on refrigerated surface transport vs. air shipment
- Position distributor sites to maximize opportunity for next day surface
delivery to our customer base
- Under proposed model, surface delivery is possible to virtually every
point in the continental U.S.
|
|
20
|
- Reduced the number of distribution sites, simplifying the process. (Soft
costs not calculated.)
- Maintained service levels to the customer.
- Reduced freight costs from $1.78 million to $1.51 million (15% - $271K)
|